Monday, December 19, 2011

US Government Paid for Climate Data that was Hidden From the Public

December 17, 2011
By Lonely Conservative 5 comments

Fox News has another bombshell from the second batch of ClimateGate emails. According to emails written by Phil Jones, the former head of University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, the Department of Energy funded data collection, and Jones hid the data obtained from the Public.

It’s like they bought the rope, with our money, for the climate alarmists to hang us with.

Making that case in 2009, the then-head of the Research Unit, Dr. Phil Jones, told colleagues repeatedly that the U.S. Department of Energy was funding his data collection — and that officials there agreed that he should not have to release the data.

“Work on the land station data has been funded by the U.S. Dept of Energy, and I have their agreement that the data needn’t be passed on. I got this [agreement] in 2007,” Jones wrote in a May 13, 2009, email to British officials, before listing reasons he did not want them to release data.

Two months later, Jones reiterated that sentiment to colleagues, saying that the data “has to be well hidden. I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”

A third email from Jones written in 2007 echoes the idea: “They are happy with me not passing on the station data,” he wrote.

The emails have outraged climate-change skeptics who say they can’t trust climate studies unless they see the raw data — and how it has been adjusted.

“In every endeavor of science, making your work replicable by others is a basic tenet of proof,” Anthony Watts, a meteorologist and climate change blogger, told FoxNews.com. “If other scientists cannot replicate your work, it brings your work into question.”

Is the Department of Energy to blame? The Climategate emails reveal correspondence only between Jones and his colleagues — not between him and the DoE.

“What’s missing,” Watts said, “is a … directive from DoE that they should withhold station data gathered under their grant. The email may be there, but … still under lock and key.” (Read More)


So, who is the Department of Justice investigating in all of this? Why, they want to find out who leaked the incriminating emails, of course.

H/T American Thinker

No comments:

Post a Comment