Monday, December 1, 2014

BREAKING: Washington Post Reporter on #Ferguson @WesleyLowery Has License Suspended, Lies About It

12/1/2014

BY  @ HTTP://GOTNEWS.COM
Wesley Lowery
A Washington Post reporter who has come under criticism for overly sympathetic stories to Michael Brown had his license suspended and then lied about it, Gotnews.com has learned.
Lowery is famous for having been questioned by Ferguson police department with Huffington Post reporter Ryan J. Reilly and way overhyping what actually happened.
Here’s a copy of that driving record. The stop says that Lowery isn’t black but Asiatic, Indian, and Arab as well as white.
It is not known if Lowery was committing a tax dodge by failing to register in DC where he now lives.
Screen Shot 2014-11-29 at 7.34.33 PM

Lowery tried to dismiss the suspension of his license.
Lowery insisted that he would change his registration once his license expired but he has been illegally driving ever since he moved to work at the Washington Post and perhaps since he drove for the Boston Globe.
He’s still driving on Kentucky license plates in 2014.
Lowery, 24, is listed at living at his parents in Shaker Heights, OH.
It looks like Lowery flouted the law when he moved to D.C., too.

Lowery wrote a controversial article about Michael Brown’s raps in which Lowery stated that Brown was rapping about Jesus. In fact Brown was rapping about violence against women and race.
Lowery is also obsessed with race. He smeared Politico as not friendly to blacks and demanded that they release their diversity numbers.
Lowery’s flouting of the law might explain his overt friendliness in his reporting about Michael Brown as well as reportedly joining the protests at Ferguson.
They both like to break the law.


source

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Fight brewing over Social Security benefits for illegal immigrants

11/30/2014







A new clash over retirement benefits has come to a head following President Obama’s decision to unilaterally protect up to 5 million illegal immigrants from deportation.

The White House now acknowledges that many of the illegal immigrants spared from deportation under Obama’s sweeping executive action will become eligible for Social Security and Medicare benefits once they reach retirement age.
The conservative backlash has been swift and will certainly extend into a GOP Congress’ deliberations in 2015 over how to limit the reach of the president’s immigration blueprint.


A central argument in Obama’s defense of the most extensive overhaul to the immigration system in decades was that those given reprieves from deportation would not qualify for Obamacare benefits. The president reminded critics that Dream Act-eligible immigrants previously granted deportation deferrals could not enroll in federal health exchanges.
However, Obama was less eager to wade into the debate about what to do with newly protected immigrants now paying into Social Security. He didn’t address the matter while outlining his immigration plan in a prime-time address to the nation, but White House aides later confirmed GOP suspicions about how Obama’s unilateral move would affect retirement benefits.

Analysts said that Republicans would use the admission to argue the president is misleading the public about the details of his immigration action.
“It is a bit of surprise,” said Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute who focuses on entitlement programs. “For a long time, there was an argument made by the administration that [undocumented immigrants] would not be eligible for such benefits. It does seem to be a contradiction.”
For Republicans, this debate is about far more than just Social Security. It fits into the broader narrative of painting the president as unwilling to spotlight an unpopular provision of his agenda until after it has been enacted.
“It’s Obamacare all over again, ‘If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor,” one House GOP leadership aide told theWashington Examiner. “Obama was very clear on this issue. He said no benefits. What the president says just isn’t credible. That couldn’t be any more obvious by now.”
The administration says Obama’s move is sound fiscal policy, that it makes sense to grow the tax base. They also argue that it would be unfair to force people to pay into Social Security and not reap the same benefits as everybody else.
Immigrants would have to work at least 10 years to qualify for Social Security and Medicare benefits, administration officials said, and Obama’s executive action could always be reversed by any of his successors.
Though quiet about the Social Security implications of the president’s latest executive action, the White House has long argued that comprehensive immigration reform would strengthen the long-term outlook of entitlement programs.
“Over 500 days ago, the United States Senate passed legislation with bipartisan support to improve border security, streamline the immigration process and establish a firm but fair path to citizenship,” Vice President Joe Biden wrote in an op-ed this week in Irish Central. “It would be an absolute game-changer for our economy, adding $1.4 trillion to our economy and reducing the deficit by nearly $850 billion over 20 years, and extending the solvency of Social Security by another two years.”
However, some fiscal hawks say that any short-term benefit of having more people paying into Social Security would be eclipsed by the burden of paying out benefits to potentially millions of additional people.
Republicans also point to the illegal immigrants not yet covered by Obama's unilateral action.
“It is also important to keep in mind that while 5 million [illegal immigrants] benefit affirmatively from executive amnesty with work permits, photo ID’s and social security numbers, almost all of the other 7 million illegal immigrants continue to remain functionally immune from enforcement,” said Stephen Miller, a spokesman for Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. “The problem for American workers will be compounded even more when the amnesty produces the ensuing wave of new illegal and chain migration.”

source

Obama WH to Promote #Ferguson Indoctrination – Including Classroom Memorials to Mike Brown

11/30/2014


Obama White House to Promote Ferguson Indoctrination 
– Including Classroom Memorials to Mike Brown and letters to Darren Wilson

This week just four days after the grand jury investigating the August police shooting in Ferguson, Missouri of unarmed robber Michael Brown by white police officer Darren Wilson resulted in no charges being filed, the Obama White House promoted leftwing indoctrination of students by teachers about the case that calls Brown a victim of police violence. The Obama Justice Department still has an open investigation in to the shooting.
The White House Twitter account with the handle “White House Af-Am Ed @AfAmEducation “ (White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans) tweeted at 3:45 p.m. EST Friday, November 28:
“ICYMI: 5 Ways to Teach About Michael Brown & Ferguson via @chrisemdin http://huff.to/1BCgGk0 Also see @PBS @teachingchange @RethinkSchools”
The link in the tweet goes to a Huffington Post article by Dr. Christopher Emdin, Ph.D. that was first published August 20th, eleven days after the Brown shooting. The article was updated on October 20th.
As mentioned in the tweet, the article is entitled, 5 Ways to Teach About Michael Brown and Ferguson in the New School Year
Dr. Christopher Emdin, Ph. D. Photo from the White House
Dr. Christopher Emdin, Ph. D. Photo from the White House
Emdin’s bio page at the Huffington Post reads in part:
“(Dr. Emdin) is a Professor at Columbia University Teachers College and is the Director of Secondary School Initiatives at the Urban Science Education Center in New York. He holds a Ph.D. in Urban Education.”
Emdin was honored this year by the Obama administration as a ‘Champion of Change’ so it is natural the White House would promote his effort to indoctrinate students in the leftwing mythology of Michael Brown.
Emdin encourages teachers to engage their students in discussing the Brown case, which is fine as in point one where he suggests teachers first find out what their students know about the case. But he crosses the line to indoctrination. For example his point four where he urges, students make a classroom memorial to “honor Michael Brown” and “create a counter-narrative to negative stories and images about Ferguson and Michael Brown”:
4. Create a classroom memorial.
“During the first few weeks of classes, students can create a memorial to Michael Brown on a classroom bulletin board. This activity involves having students use whatever they feel skilled in to create something that would honor Michael Brown and other people who have been victims of police and other violence. Students may choose to draw, write poetry, design art pieces, paint, or collect news clippings. Students can use this opportunity to create a counter-narrative to negative stories and images about Ferguson and Michael Brown, or even to document stories and images they have seen in the media about the case. Engaging in this type of activity allows teachers to understand youth strengths and form classroom solidarity.”
Emdin’s point three encourages students being assigned to write letters to Officer Wilson and others involved in the case:
3. Ask students to write letters.
“One of the chief ways to engage youth in the first few weeks of school and also develop their sociopolitical awareness is to give them an assignment to write letters to all those who are involved in the shooting. This includes politicians, police officers, the families of victims of the violence, and even the deceased…”
Point two tells teachers to make the connection between the Brown case and other recent controversial deaths of African-Americans:
2. Help students make connections.
“It is important for young people to learn how to make connections between the Michael Brown shooting and similar cases that have emerged in recent history. While a discussion of the Michael Brown shooting and the current events in Ferguson are powerful, conversations about Michael Brown with a consideration of Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, Renisha Mcbride and other cases that involve similar scenarios place the events in Ferguson in proper context…”
Point five is: Carry the theme for the rest of the year.”
Classroom solidarity, sociopolitical awareness—this is what matters in the world of liberal education.
The article closes with this notice:
“To learn more ways to being (sic) Ferguson and Michael Brown into the classroom, follow the #HipHopEd and #FergusonSyllabus hashtags on Twitter.”
Clicking on #FergusonSyllabus shows teachers are using the Brown case for indoctrination.
As an example of the attitude held by the education establishment, here are a few tweets by an educator in San Francisco:

“To those being weird about the #Ferguson posters around… This is a “social justice”-oriented school. I don’t know what you were expecting”

“Also, only 30-ish% of students are White. Do you really think we’re going to be REMOTELY pro-Wilson in this situation?”
Parents might want to ask their children what their schools are telling them about the situation in Ferguson, Missouri before they return to class next week.
Congress might want to look in to why the Obama administration is promoting the indoctrination of students about the Brown case.


source

Anchor Babies In The News: Teen accused of rape, telling victim not to call police

11/30/2014


Photo: 

A teen is accused of raping a woman then telling her he would leave her alone. 
The Pharr Police Department arrested the 19-year-old on a sexual assault charge during late October. 
Angel Martinez allegedly told the woman he wanted to “be with her”, while they were eating at the woman’s home.
The woman told him "no", but he grabbed her by her arm and took her into a bedroom, according to a criminal complaint in the case.
Action 4 News does not identify victims of sexual abuse.
Records show an immigration detainer has been issues since Martinez is now in custody.
He was booked into the Hidalgo County Jail late last week.
His bond was set at $100,000 for the felony charge.


source