Why We Need the British Freedom Party

In the spring of 2012, the British Freedom Party officially began working together with the English Defence League (EDL) street protest movement. Two senior EDL leaders, Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll, joined the Executive Council of British Freedom. The two organizations will cooperate, but nevertheless remain separate.

As British Freedom declares in its mission statement, “The objectives of the British Freedom Party shall be to defend and restore the freedoms, traditions, unity, identity, democracy and independence of the British people, to establish full sovereignty over all our national affairs by restoring the supremacy of the British Parliament, to withdraw from the European Union, to promote democratic British patriotic principles, to promote the social, economic, environmental and cultural interests of the British people and to preserve and promote the ancestral rights and liberties of the British people as defined in the British Constitution.”

At the website Gates of Vienna, British Freedom leader Paul Weston, a brave and eloquent English patriot, picked a random week in May 2011 to provide a detailed description of the utter financial, moral, legal and cultural rot that is modern British life. Law-abiding citizens are fleeced by thugs as well as their own government, while immigrant gangs spread fear in the streets. The UK, like most Western countries today, has virtually abandoned its border controls and is being flooded by a tsunami of global mass migration. Britain has become a place where real crime goes nearly unpunished whereas thought crimes against the Multicultural order are dealt with harshly.

Paul Weston warned back then that, “Although it is just a snapshot, it outlines a country, a government and a people whose civilisational timeline is now measured in years rather than decades or centuries. We are no longer serious about the serious matter of survival. We have nowhere to turn and no one to realistically represent us. Britain, as Lawrence Auster constantly reminds us, is a nation of the living dead.”

In the UK, dozens of predominately Muslim men have sex with underage white native girls, vulnerable teenagers targeted because of their ethnic and religious background. In May 2012 nine men from South Asia were jailed for a total of 77 years for raping and abusing up to 47 girls, some as young as 13. The men all come from Pakistan, apart from one failed asylum-seeker from Afghanistan, and have names such as Kabeer Hassan, Abdul Aziz, Abdul Rauf, Mohammed Sajid, Adil Khan, Mohammed Amin, Abdul Qayyum and Hamid Safi.

The girls were passed around. At least one victim was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night. A Muslim leader warned that some Pakistani men “think that white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought.” The judge jailed the 59-year-old ringleader for 19 years and eight other men for between four and 12 years, telling them they had treated their victims “as though they were worthless and beyond all respect.” Detective Inspector Michael Sanderson of Greater Manchester Police said that none of the convicted men have ever shown “the slightest bit of remorse” for the pain they inflicted upon their child victims. Many of them, not just in England or Britain but in other European countries as well, see white girls as “easy meat.”

What has angered the general public the most about this and similar cases is that these Muslim predators were largely allowed to go on with their rape and abuse for years because the police were so scared of being called “racists.” Several of the young victims felt that the authorities did not believe them when they told their stories.

Sadly, such stories are likely to increase in number as the native population is being ethnically displaced in their own country at a breathtaking pace due to the largest and fastest immigration waves in all of human history. Already today there are few English people left in certain parts of the English capital city, accurately dubbed “Londonistan” by the author Melanie Phillips due to its expanding zones of Islamic law. Ken Livingstone, a former Mayor of London for the Labour Party who recently wanted to reclaim that title, bragged that he wanted to turn it (London) into a “beacon” of Islam.

As elsewhere in the Western world, the so-called “conservatives” of the establishment may be slightly better than the left-wing parties, but not by much. One sometimes gets the impression that “conservatives” are people who implement the radical left-wing agenda at a slightly slower pace than the radical Leftists. That’s certainly how the past 50 years appear. Prime Minister David Cameron in the United Kingdom, Chancellor Angela Merkel in Germany and President Nicolas Sarkozy in France have all stated that Multiculturalism has failed, but none of them has done much to curtail the primary problems: open borders and mass immigration of non-Europeans.

Nicolas Sarkozy in May 2012 lost the French presidency to his Socialist rival François Hollande, partly due to his chronic unwillingness or inability to clamp down on mass immigration and the ongoing ethnic displacement of native Frenchmen. The new Socialist President Hollande crucially received about 93% of the Muslim vote in France, a percentage comparable to the immigrant votes for Socialist parties in some other Western countries.

How do the authorities react to the rise in violent crime and international mafias? By increasing surveillance of peaceful citizens. In 2012 a program is underway in the UK – no doubt complemented by related plans on a pan-European level promoted by the EU – that would give government access to personal data. British officials have given their word: “We won’t read your emails.” Yet experts say that the proposed surveillance program will gather so much data that spooks won’t have to read your messages to guess what you’re up to.

If passed in its current form, it would put a huge amount of personal data at the government’s disposal, which it could potentially use to deduce a startling amount about Britons’ private life – from sleep patterns to driving habits or infidelity. “We’re really entering a whole new phase of analysis based on the data that we can collect,” said Gerald Kane, an information systems expert at Boston College. “There is quite a lot you can learn.”

The American columnist Samuel T. Francis labeled this “anarcho-tyranny,” a toxic mix of virtual anarchy in the streets combined with near-totalitarian repression. It describes a situation where the authorities have lost any semblance of control over public safety, but try to prevent citizens from protecting their own lives and property.

The state is everywhere, and it is nowhere at the same time: useless when hostile ethnic groups move into your cities and push you out, but always eager to regulate the fat content of your yoghurt. It is totally incapable of upholding your country’s borders, which have broken down under a tidal wave of immigrants who often have no legal right to be in your country, yet still charges very high taxes in spite of its persistent failures. It is impotent when faced with violent tribes harassing your sons and daughters, but quite capable of removing your cultural heritage from the school curriculum and giving your children lessons on the sex life of transvestites.

The English author George Orwell was one of the most insightful analysts of the totalitarian mindset. When Orwell published his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four in 1949 he meant it as a warning. British ruling elites today read is as an instruction manual. That is why we need the British Freedom Party, to restore freedom to the British population.

Britain was once at the forefront of political liberty. With the help of British Freedom, it can become so once more.

SOURCE: British Freedom.org