12/11/2014
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) realizes there are more young people on earth today than at any other time in human history, and the organization has a plan to reduce this segment of the population in order to achieve what it calls a “demographic dividend.”
To reach this goal, the UNFPA is working toward a program that will make abortion freely accessible to adolescents, eliminate the age of consent, remove drug and prostitution laws and restrict parental involvement when it comes to helping their children make decisions regarding their sexual development and health.
UN officials are reportedly emphatic about unleashing youth to the harsh realities of sexual libertinism, which will work to drive populations down across the globe. A recently released UNFPA report titled “The 2014 State of World Population” states that the younger generations must have all the sexual freedom and services they want.
“[Y]oung people require a wide range of sexual and reproductive health services, including … safe abortion care,” the report stresses.
The UNFPA is anxious to get such programs under way, claiming that legal systems in most nations are not following through in a timely manner with the agreements they allegedly signed in international human rights treaties.
“[They have] yet to catch up with the realities of adolescents and youth,” UNFPA officials assert, noting that unprecedented opportunities for progress exist for the youth, but that this can only become a reality if future generations’ populations are reduced.
However, it is contested that no such commitments were made via any UN treaties.
Oas
“No UN treaty mentions abortion, nor obliges countries to make youth vulnerable to adults offering sexual and reproductive services,” contends Rebecca Oas, Ph.D., according to LifeSiteNews.com. “Of particular concern to UNFPA are age of consent laws requiring parental permission to access abortion, contraceptives or other services like needle exchange programs for drug users.”
Leaving them to their own devices
UNFPA officials are adamant that laws prohibiting youth from having sex until they reach a minimum age keep youth from maturing and making responsible decisions on their own.
“[A]ge of consent laws contradict the idea that young people should participate in decisions that affect them in line with their evolving capabilities,” the UN authors of the 2014 report state.
The UNFPA goes even further by condemning laws designed to protect youth from harmful activities and lifestyles.
“[Prohibitions against] same-sex behavior, drug use and selling sex or sex work … fall particularly hard on young people realizing their sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” UNFPA officials argue in their report.
Even though the writers of the report concede that parents should be the first to influence their child’s sexual development, they end up writing off this concept as being too idealistic.
“[This] does not happen the way it should … [as parents] do not know how to talk to their children about such matters,” the UNFPA insists.
UNFPA officials then completely throw out the need for parental guidance and put their faith in youths’ human nature.
“[Good choices] could be influenced by policy interventions, such as those that loosen age or parental-consent restrictions on adolescents’ access to services,” the UN policy makers reason in their report.
Less laws, less people
Oas argues that the UN uses lingo about liberty and productivity to hide its ultimate agenda, which is allegedly to increase mortality rates in the youth generation.
“While UNFPA’s primary concern is curbing population growth, its focus on young people is steeped in the language of human rights, maximizing potential and removing barriers to success,” Oas emphasizes. “Young people are not only the targets of the approach, but are also being groomed to be its chief proponents. That means giving them messages they are not hearing at home or in their communities.”
Oas, who is associate director of research for the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, also points out that dwindling birthrates are often proven to have adverse effects on society — a direct contradiction to the UNFPA’s plan for success.
“However, the premise that reducing the fertility of developing countries will catapult them into prosperity is questionable,” Oas explains. “Countries with low fertility and growing elderly populations face increasing financial burdens, since dependent children incur lower costs than dependent older people.”
She contends that the UNFPA has it all backwards, but is pressing forward with its plan to reach its primary objective — lower populations.
“Economists have observed that a drop in fertility tends to follow, rather than precede, increased economic prosperity, which is why the ‘demographic dividend’ appeared more pronounced in Asia than in Latin America or other developing regions,” Oas reports.
Even though the UNFPA report recognizes that limited schooling and jobs, as well as recessions, contribute to the oppression of youths, it clearly concentrates on a lack of sexual freedom as being the main evil holding young people back.
“[Poverty] can be a powerful barrier to individuals getting what they need to achieve their sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” the UN makers of the report emphasize.
Oas concludes that the UNFPA is dead set on unleashing youths to experience sexual libertinism, despite the known dangers, in order to reach its ultimate goal — global population control.
“In total, the UNFPA report asserts that the key to development is ensuring that adolescents’ sexual behavior is unsupervised, unrestricted, publicly funded, and, above all, non-procreative,” Oas warns. “UNFPA posits that the imposition of sexual anarchy upon youth will ensure their well-being and that of the whole world.”
source
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) realizes there are more young people on earth today than at any other time in human history, and the organization has a plan to reduce this segment of the population in order to achieve what it calls a “demographic dividend.”
To reach this goal, the UNFPA is working toward a program that will make abortion freely accessible to adolescents, eliminate the age of consent, remove drug and prostitution laws and restrict parental involvement when it comes to helping their children make decisions regarding their sexual development and health.UN officials are reportedly emphatic about unleashing youth to the harsh realities of sexual libertinism, which will work to drive populations down across the globe. A recently released UNFPA report titled “The 2014 State of World Population” states that the younger generations must have all the sexual freedom and services they want.
“[Y]oung people require a wide range of sexual and reproductive health services, including … safe abortion care,” the report stresses.
The UNFPA is anxious to get such programs under way, claiming that legal systems in most nations are not following through in a timely manner with the agreements they allegedly signed in international human rights treaties.
“[They have] yet to catch up with the realities of adolescents and youth,” UNFPA officials assert, noting that unprecedented opportunities for progress exist for the youth, but that this can only become a reality if future generations’ populations are reduced.
However, it is contested that no such commitments were made via any UN treaties.
OasLeaving them to their own devices
UNFPA officials are adamant that laws prohibiting youth from having sex until they reach a minimum age keep youth from maturing and making responsible decisions on their own.
“[A]ge of consent laws contradict the idea that young people should participate in decisions that affect them in line with their evolving capabilities,” the UN authors of the 2014 report state.
The UNFPA goes even further by condemning laws designed to protect youth from harmful activities and lifestyles.
“[Prohibitions against] same-sex behavior, drug use and selling sex or sex work … fall particularly hard on young people realizing their sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” UNFPA officials argue in their report.
Even though the writers of the report concede that parents should be the first to influence their child’s sexual development, they end up writing off this concept as being too idealistic.
“[This] does not happen the way it should … [as parents] do not know how to talk to their children about such matters,” the UNFPA insists.
UNFPA officials then completely throw out the need for parental guidance and put their faith in youths’ human nature.
“[Good choices] could be influenced by policy interventions, such as those that loosen age or parental-consent restrictions on adolescents’ access to services,” the UN policy makers reason in their report.
Less laws, less people
Oas argues that the UN uses lingo about liberty and productivity to hide its ultimate agenda, which is allegedly to increase mortality rates in the youth generation.
“While UNFPA’s primary concern is curbing population growth, its focus on young people is steeped in the language of human rights, maximizing potential and removing barriers to success,” Oas emphasizes. “Young people are not only the targets of the approach, but are also being groomed to be its chief proponents. That means giving them messages they are not hearing at home or in their communities.”
Oas, who is associate director of research for the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, also points out that dwindling birthrates are often proven to have adverse effects on society — a direct contradiction to the UNFPA’s plan for success.
“However, the premise that reducing the fertility of developing countries will catapult them into prosperity is questionable,” Oas explains. “Countries with low fertility and growing elderly populations face increasing financial burdens, since dependent children incur lower costs than dependent older people.”
She contends that the UNFPA has it all backwards, but is pressing forward with its plan to reach its primary objective — lower populations.“Economists have observed that a drop in fertility tends to follow, rather than precede, increased economic prosperity, which is why the ‘demographic dividend’ appeared more pronounced in Asia than in Latin America or other developing regions,” Oas reports.
Even though the UNFPA report recognizes that limited schooling and jobs, as well as recessions, contribute to the oppression of youths, it clearly concentrates on a lack of sexual freedom as being the main evil holding young people back.
“[Poverty] can be a powerful barrier to individuals getting what they need to achieve their sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” the UN makers of the report emphasize.
Oas concludes that the UNFPA is dead set on unleashing youths to experience sexual libertinism, despite the known dangers, in order to reach its ultimate goal — global population control.
“In total, the UNFPA report asserts that the key to development is ensuring that adolescents’ sexual behavior is unsupervised, unrestricted, publicly funded, and, above all, non-procreative,” Oas warns. “UNFPA posits that the imposition of sexual anarchy upon youth will ensure their well-being and that of the whole world.”
source
No comments:
Post a Comment