Friday, August 24, 2012

Egyptians challenge Islamist president, some scuffle




By Edmund Blair and Marwa Awad
Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:40am EDT

CAIRO (Reuters) - Opponents of Egypt's President Mohamed Mursi scuffled with his supporters on Friday during a demonstration that posed the first test of the Islamist leader's popularity on the street.

Egyptians had been nervous that an anti-Mursi protest, flagged for several weeks, could turn violent and in Cairo's Tahrir Square rival groups hurled stones at each other. Some wielded sticks and charged their opponents.

Scenes were calmer in other areas of the city where Mursi's opponents also gathered. But total numbers across the city were still relatively small by early afternoon, numbering in the hundreds. Protests tend to build later in the day in summer.

Activists behind the protest accuse Mursi of seeking to monopolize power after he wrested back powers in August that the military council, which had ruled Egypt for a year and a half, had sought to retain for itself.

But several liberal groups usually critical of the Muslim Brotherhood stayed away from the protest, including the April 6 youth movement that helped galvanize support to oust President Hosni Mubarak in 2011.

Those declining to demonstrate did so either because they felt it was too early to judge Mursi, two months into his presidency, or that any challenge should be by ballot box and not on the street.

"Wake up Egyptian people. Don't fall for the Brotherhood," said Mahmoud, in his 50s, addressing about 200 people in Tahrir Square. "Egypt is for all Egyptians, not only one group."

The violence flared when bangs went off nearby, but it was not clear if they was caused by a weapon, fireworks or something else, a Reuters witness said.

Some Tahrir demonstrators chanted: "What does the (Brotherhood's) guide want? He wants everyone to kiss his feet," a reference to the spiritual leader of the Islamist group.

The organizers, among them opposition politician Mohamed Abou Hamed, also want a probe into the funding of the Brotherhood, repressed by Mubarak during his 30-year rule but which has dominated the political scene since he was toppled.

In a headline before the protests, the daily Al Masry Al Youm called the demonstration "the first test for Mursi."

Protest organizers said they would march towards the presidential palace to protest against Mursi, sworn in on June 30 as Egypt's first president not drawn from military ranks.

"Both Tantawi and the Brotherhood stole the revolution and destroyed Egypt," said Mohsen Abed Rabuh, a government worker, referring to Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, Egypt's interim ruler, who was dismissed by Mursi this month.

He was speaking in Cairo's Abbasiya area, near the Defence Ministry, where dozens of protesters had gathered and more were congregating. It was the site of clashes between protesters and soldiers earlier this year when the army was still in charge.

The road leading to the ministry was cordoned off.

Security officials said they would protect peaceful protests but would act firmly against any lawbreakers after speculation in the press and social media that protesters could target Brotherhood premises.

CRITICISMS

The protest's Facebook page said it would be peaceful.

April 6 said in a statement before the protest that it disagreed with the Brotherhood on many issues but added: "Does all that and more push us to issue a judgment now to burn the group's members or premises and exile them from the country?"

Ahmed Said, head of the Free Egyptians, another liberal group staying away, wrote on Facebook: "Those who want to bring down the Brotherhood should bring them down via elections."

Mursi, propelled to the presidency by the well-organized Brotherhood, has formally resigned from the group saying he wanted to represent the whole nation in office.

Among criticisms of Mursi have been accusations that he has sought to muzzle the media. Critics point to a trial of two journalists, including the editor of the opposition newspaper Al-Dostour, for insulting the president.

Mursi went some way to deflecting criticism when he issued a law on Thursday, his first use of the legislative power that he wrested from the army, banning pre-trial detention of journalists. The Al-Dostour editor had been ordered detained just hours earlier.

Activists said more should be done.

"We welcome President Mursi's decision to ban pre-trial detention but urge thorough reform that repeals the archaic laws criminalizing the reporting of news and the expression of opinion," said Joel Simon, executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Some liberals have backed Mursi's early moves, including his August 12 decision to dismiss top generals, who were seen as obstructing civilian rule, and to cancel a decree that had given the army legislative power in the absence of the parliament.

The lower house, dominated by Mursi's Brotherhood, was dissolved by the military in June, based on a court order, shortly before the end of the presidential race.

One of the biggest tests Mursi faces is whether he can turn around the stricken economy. Anger at the gaping rich-poor divide was a major spark for the anti-Mubarak revolt.

This week, Egypt started talks for a $4.8 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund which could help rebuild confidence in a nation that was once a darling of frontier market investors.

(Additional reporting by Omar Fahmy and Ashraf Fahim; Writing by Edmund Blair; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)

The Psychotic in power are calling us mentally ill

I think Obama is a Marxist, Communist, usurper who hates America. He is a narcissistic, evil man who pretends to be a Christian. Where is the mental illness folks?

- Dr. Laurie Roth
Thursday, August 23, 2012


(Canadian Free Press) - Obama and his goons are making everything back to front and upside down. Good is bad and bad is good. If you are Christian and a gun owning patriot you are mentally ill, dangerous, and should be taken away. This week we heard and followed what felt like the unbelievable in our country but the stories were true. Sane people practicing their 1st amendment rights are being identified as ‘risks’ ‘mentally ill’ ‘dangerous and needing treatment.’

Just some of these evolving cases of mental illness and danger

Doug Hagmann, Director of Northeast Intelligence Network and veteran private investigator exposed how one of his listeners and callers had been literally picked up by cops after a ‘mystery’ friend called in a mental health concern. This led to Jason Egroff, being forcibly whisked away by cops, probed, questioned, humiliated and searched for 18 hours, then released. Hagmann found that the alleged friend who turned him in was far different than represented and Jason was not mentally ill or a danger at all. The only apparent danger and crime Jason committed was exercising his first amendment rights and daring to share concerns about the Government and 9/11. So what? Many people have concerns about 9/11 who are not insane.

Another mental health nightmare was experienced by Marine Corps veteran, Brandon J. Raub, 26. He was also forcibly held for 30 days out of concern of his ‘face book’ postings. He said things like “Find and rediscover the ideas of liberty and freedom, “Those are the ideas that make us great as people.” He also wrote, “Your leaders are planning to merge the United States into a one-world banking system, “They want to put computer chips in you…these men have evil hearts. They have tricked you into supporting corporate fascism. We gave them the keys to our country. We were not vigilant with our republic.” He also wrote, “I am standing against a great evil. I will do it all by myself if I have to.” Thankfully, a Judge ordered his release and said his commitment was invalid and there was no basis to hold him.

Cases like this are starting to appear all over. Doug Hagmann said they are growing. Patriots, simply daring to confront Obama in print or on air are being set up to be a mental health risk and carried away. It is classic dictatorial intimidation and strategy.

Enemies must be identified, taken away, re-educated or silenced. That puts a huge target on the foreheads of any real Christian, patriot, Tea Party member or Veteran. Most citizens with any backbone see that Obama is busy transforming America to a socialist/Marxist regime and trying to establish a dictatorship. Otherwise, why have over 40 Czars bypassing congress and answering only to Obama. Why have a sea of unconstitutional executive orders spelling out martial law controls and takeovers. Why turn secret service on people who are exercising their right to peacefully assemble in protest against Obama? Why have 30,000 drones flying over our head?

Given the forced health care with threat of fines, violation of our Miranda rights with the NDAA, the illegal war in Libya, slaughter of our 1st amendment rights, shredding of our economy and energy industry, you would have to be extremely mentally ill not to be concerned and a coward not to open your mouth and be heard.

Obama is simply doing what most classic dictators have done when starting to apprehend, threaten and terrorize the people. He is hiding behind ‘mental illness’ concerns. That way, he can quiet some, intimidate others into silence while apprehending guns and freedom.

My Ph.D. is in counseling and mental health. Judging by how Obama works and views Americans, we are all considered mentally ill and expendable.

“This isn’t just any ‘bitter clinger’ writing this, Mr. Obama. It is Dr. Bitter Clinger to you.” I love the Lord, my Constitution, country, freedom and my family.

I think Obama is a Marxist, Communist, usurper who hates America. He is a narcissistic, evil man who pretends to be a Christian. Where is the mental illness, folks? Join me and my bitter clinger self each day at: Therothshow.com

FACT: Mitt Romney Says That The Reason He Won't Release His Tax Returns Has To Do With His Religion

Brett LoGiurato
Aug. 23, 2012, 4:09 PM

Business Insider:

Mitt Romney has said he won't release more than two years of tax returns because "you can never satisfy the opposition research team of the Obama organization."


But in a forthcoming interview with Parade magazine, Romney revealed a new reason why he's hesitant to release more returns: He does not want to make public his donations to the LDS Church.

Here's what Romney told Parade, according to The Salt-Lake Tribune:

"Our church doesn’t publish how much people have given. This is done entirely privately. One of the downsides of releasing one’s financial information is that this is now all public, but we had never intended our contributions to be known. It’s a very personal thing between ourselves and our commitment to our God and to our church."

Romney has released one year of tax returns and plans to release another before the election. He has come under fire from the Obama campaign and Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who charged that Romney did not pay taxes for 10 years.

His one year of released returns shows that Romney donated just less than $4.1 million to the LDS Church on an income of more than $40 million.

In bringing up a new reason for not releasing the returns, however, Romney may have thrust the subject back into the news cycle for the next few days as the Republican National Convention prepares to start up.

Obama Mentor Preckwinkle: Reagan Deserves 'Special Place in Hell'


by Tony Lee
23 Aug 2012

Breitbart News Service - Toni Preckwinkle, an Obama ally and mentor and Cook County, Illinois Board President, said on Tuesday President Ronald Reagan deserved a “special place in hell” for “making drug use political.”

"What? You didn't like that?" Preckwinkle said after members of the audience gasped, according to the Chicago Tribune.

Preckwinkle was discussing drug policy and how she felt drug treatment should not be a part of the criminal justice system. She was defending the decision by Chicago city officials to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana. And her comments were in reference to Reagan’s “war on drugs,” which President Richard Nixon started. During Reagan’s tenure, First Lady Nancy Reagan started the “Just Say No” campaign against drugs.

Preckwinkle made those comments in downstate Illinois. Reagan was born in Tampico, Illinois.

Preckwinkle helped Obama challenge the signatures of his primary opponents to run unopposed in his 1996 state senate race. Obama often reminisces about this race as a heroic, Rudy-esque foray into politics in which he overcame all odds to win.

A Message from the Radicals of 'Coalition to March on the RNC'


by Liberty Chick
24 Aug 2012, 3:17 AM PDT

Breitbart News Service:

As the Republican National Convention draws closer, protesters with Occupy Wall Street and notable activist organizations on the left are continuing to organize and are encouraging others to travel to Tampa to join them. OccupyWallSt.org posted a message Thursday from the Coalition to March on the RNC, calling for solidarity – it reads, in part:

As of now, we are a Coalition uniting groups from around the country to say NO to this political system that only works for the 1% and therefore are marching at the Republican National Convention to let our voices be heard. Together we stand to march for good jobs, healthcare, affordable education, equality and peace. On top of this, we stand against all parties of the 1% and have also endorsed the March on Wall St. South, who will protest the DNC in Charlotte, NC. For too long people have suffered while the rich got richer. We say money for human needs, not on wars overseas and corporate greed.

The Coalition to March on the RNC describes itself as “a coalition of community groups, students, working families, and people across the country organizing to protest the attacks on the 99% by the Republican Party.” One of its organizers is Mick Kelly, a prominent anti-war activist and one of the organizers of a violence-riddled protest at the 2008 RNC in St. Paul, Minnesota. Kelly was also one of six subjects of an FBI raid in 2010 in a separate incident pertaining to the Freedom Road Socialist Organization, a group he founded, in which an arrest warrant sought evidence “that Kelly provided, attempted, or conspired to provide "material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations."

September 17th will mark the one year anniversary of Occupy Wall Street. With camps across the country having been disassembled and numerous arrests having marred the movement, protesters - and their political allies - are eager to build its momentum again before the arrival of the November elections.

But reports of potential violence could further blemish the Occupy image as it continues struggling to portray itself as a “peaceful, non-violent movement of the 99%.”

On Wednesday, a bulletin jointly issued by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security warned that groups of anarchists could be planning to blockade bridges, shut down local transit systems and employ the use of molotov cocktails or acid-filled eggs to disrupt the convention and local infrastructure in and around the Tampa area. Tampa police reported on Tuesday the confiscation of dubious materials – including pipes, bricks and other suspicious items – from a building rooftop near the vicinity of the convention site.

Such reports don’t seem to be hindering the efforts of Occupy organizers, as they plan for thousands to descend upon Tampa during the upcoming week, with the support of hundreds of prominent staple organizations of the institutional left.

Together, we are planning a 5000 strong march at the first day of the convention on Aug 27th. We have hundreds of national and local organizations such as Code Pink, Veterans for Peace, Get EQUAL, Dream defenders, United National Antiwar Coalition, Occupy Tampa, Occupy USF, Occupy Pensacola, Occupy Tallahassee and more (See here for full list) endorsing us and we would love for all Occupy Assemblies to come down to Tampa to join and/or endorse our coalition. Only through unity is there strength.

Business Insider reports that protesters are already on the scene in Tampa.

Members of the movement tell Business Insider that hundreds of protestors are already camped out near the Tampa Bay Times Forum, where the RNC will be held, in a spot they've dubbed 'Romneyville'.

Tampa's city council has already ruled not to evict them from the area, and Occupiers say chartered buses will bring hundreds more to join them over the weekend. Another camp is being set up in Freedom Park, also near the Forum.

And some of the groups’ events schedule is packed with an eclectic mix of rallies, marches and parties. These include:
March on the RNC
March For Our Lives, by the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign (see note below)
Voter Suppression Rally
“Shut Down Bain Capital” Day of Action
Roving Radical Dance Party
"Let Them Eat Cake Drum Circle Dance Party" in “Romneyville”, and
a day of action “to expose and confront the ecocidal elite”

It is worth noting that Romneyville is a camp established outside of the security perimeters near the RNC in Tampa. It is operated by the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign, an organization we mentioned earlier this week at Breitbart News in a post titled “RNC: Hints of Violence as Law Enforcement Prepares for Tampa,” which covered the activities of Tampa Bay Action Group, a member group of the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign.

The Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign describes itself as “a movement that unites the poor across color lines.” In 2008, the group organized and led the historic Poor People’s March at the RNC in St. Paul, Minnesota. The Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign was associated with a non-permitted march in NYC in August of 2004, during which protesters attacked a police detective and kicked him in the head, leaving the man unconscious, according to the NY Daily News. Cheri Honkala, the 2012 VP nominee for the Green Party and former Green Party candidate for Philadelphia Sheriff, is the organization’s co-founder. Honkala and her organization have also been active with the Occupy DC and October2011 groups, among others, and will be leading the “March for Our Lives” event at the RNC in Tampa on August 27th, along with Green Party Presidential candidate Jill Stein.

It would appear that the groups and individuals associated with the protest activities planned at the RNC are as eclectic as the activities they’ve planned.

To view a complete list of organizations endorsing the March on the RNC, visit the Endorsing Organizations page of the event’s website.

Indicators: Household income drops to levels below that of the recession

Published August 24, 2012
By Bruce McQuain

Quando.net:

Another sign or indicator of how the upcoming Presidential election may go may be found in the level of household income. It’s down. In fact it is down to below the levels it had fallen during the recession.

Household income is down sharply since the recession ended three years ago, according to a report released Thursday, providing another sign of the stubborn weakness of the economic recovery.

From June 2009 to June 2012, inflation-adjusted median household income fell 4.8 percent to $50,964, according to a report by Sentier Research, a firm headed by two former Census Bureau executives.

Incomes have dropped more since the beginning of the recovery than they did during the recession itself, when they declined 2.6 percent, according to the report, which analyzed data from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey. The recession, the most severe since the Great Depression, lasted from December 2007 to June 2009.

Overall, median income is 7.2 percent below its December 2007 level and 8.1 percent below where it stood in January 2000, which was at $55,470, according to the report.


Of course, being an average, the impact has been both far reaching and deep. That means personal. We’re not discussing some esoteric issue that seems more abstract than real or some policy which may never effect voters. We’re talking about their family’s income, what they take home, the means by which they support their family.

This drop speaks to millions of jobs lost, those who have found jobs likely to be under employed, belt tightening among households to get by.

If someone asked the question, “are you better off now than you were 4 years ago”, the answer for a very large portion of America would be “no”.

The next question then, maybe not asked out loud, but certainly considered is: “are you willing to give the President 4 more years considering what has or hasn’t been accomplished this 4 years?”

Again, other than the ideologues and the yellow-dog voters, that’s a question a vast majority will answer when they pull the curtain on the voting booth. Given history and the indicators we keep seeing, I believe the answer to that question is also going to be “no”.

~McQ

Twitter: @McQandO

Facebook: QandO

Not the Behavior of a Winning Campaign

Posted by Erick Erickson (Diary)
Friday, August 24th at 4:46AM EDT

(Red State) - The media keeps showing its rear end. Let me just make that clear. If you are a competent reporter, I’m not sure how you cannot be embarrassed by the majority of those in your profession right now covering politics.

From Mark Halperin, to Jake Tapper, to Chuck Todd, more journalists are actually now admitting just how pliable the media is when it comes to Barack Obama’s spin. All week long, as the economy deteriorates, most every anchor at most every news outlet, most every editorialist in most every paper, and most every “centrist” and liberal pundit has been pointing out the GOP’s extremist abortion position.

Few, if any, have pointed out that Barack Obama’s abortion on demand position is extreme. Few, if any, have pointed out how most Americans favor restrictions on abortion. Few, if any, have pointed out that Mitt Romney’s position is actually more mainstream than Barack Obama’s. Few, if any, have wanted to go beyond Politifact’s ham-handed cover for Obama on infanticide and get into what Barack Obama actually said in 2002. Hear him come out for infanticide yourself right here. Remember, the media is hiding behind the left-leaning Politifact (and yes, it does lean left) to avoid having to deal with this.

They cannot help themselves. But why are they doing it?

They are doing it for the exact same reason Joe Biden is claiming the GOP will put black people back in chains and why Barack Obama would rather talk about uteri than jobs — they all know Barack Obama is losing this thing.

Hysteria creeps into campaigns when the campaigns know they are losing. When George H. W. Bush saw the election slipping away in 1992, he took to referring to Bill Clinton and Al Gore as Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum. The invective went up as his poll numbers went down.

Barack Obama and the Democrats are going to throw in the towel on the tradition of sitting on the sidelines during their opponent’s political convention. In the past, the parties did this with each other. Not now. The Obama campaign cannot afford to. It is too close and polling is about to shift from registered voters to likely voters, which will generate negative numbers for him. He must surrender another tradition to engage in more hyper partisan mudslinging because he is losing.

More and more polls are showing Mitt Romney trending upwards in swing states. More and more polls are showing Americans growing more pessimistic about the economy. More and more economists are starting to worry about the economy. Gas prices and milk prices are going up while take home pay is going down.

The hysterics we are seeing from the Democrats come as reality hits everyone. Even I have been convinced that Romney was going to blow this thing. The stupid statement about the Soptics not having the fate they had if they were in Massachusetts could have been game over.

But then Paul Ryan became the veep pick. He has now given Romney purpose. He has defined the campaign. He has put Barack Obama on defense. Consider this — the sage voices of the GOP were convinced the GOP could not win the fight on budgetary and entitlement reform. They were convinced Paul Ryan would sink the ticket.

Then the Democrats tried to define Paul Ryan and failed. They have been failing ever since. Their attempts to define Mitt Romney didn’t do enough and they have yet to settle on a narrative to define Paul Ryan. They are grasping at straws. Now they’d even fight the Associated Press style book to try to go after Paul Ryan.

And that gets us back to the media. At what point will they finally start asking if Barack Obama needs a campaign shake up? Because if it was Mitt Romney in the same boat, they sure as hell would. In fact, there have already been two different media cycles about Romney needing a campaign shake up and not one about Barack Obama.

Why? The simple truth remains the vast majority of the media is more sympathetic to and friendly with Team Obama and would hate to ruffle the feathers of friends. It’s one of the greatest thing Mitt Romney has going for him right now.

From America's Gun Control Capital: 19 shot in overnight violence, 8 in one incident

Updated at 06:11 AM Aug. 24, 2012
Jason Knowles



August 24, 2012 (CHICAGO) (WLS) -- Chicago police are searching for a person who shot and wounded eight people in one incident on the South Side at 79th and Kingston.

Two of the victims are 14- and 15-year-olds; both are at Comer Children's Hospital being treated for gunshot wounds. One of them was shot in the arm. Another was shot in the back of the neck.

Police were in the area at 78th and Essex around 9:15 p.m. Thursday when gunshots rang out. Eight people were hit. Seven young men and one woman were hit ranging in age from 14 to 20. Most are in stable condition.

79th is a known north-south dividing line for gangs.

Moments after police started investigating, some investigators rushed to a nearby motel at 81st and Stony Island. There was a blood trail leading to a room. SWAT teams stormed into that room, but nobody was inside.

There were also other shootings overnight. Those were separate incidents, but in all, 19 people were shot and injured from Thursday night into early Friday morning.

(Copyright ©2012 WLS-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)

Shocker: Obama's Jobs Council chief, GE CEO Jeff Immelt, says he will vote for Romney? (Obama has had no jobs council meetings in months)

August 23, 2012
Hyscience.com

And Charlie Gasparino's details speak volumes about Obama's genuine disinterest in actually creating jobs!



"Great campaigner ... but not a good president"

Author of Book on Bin Laden Raid Is Identified

August 23, 2012, 1:20 pm
By JULIE BOSMAN and THOM SHANKER

New York Times:

The anonymous Navy SEAL member who has written a book about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden remained anonymous for less than 24 hours.

At midday Thursday, Fox News identified him as Matt Bissonnette, a 36-year-old originally from Alaska, and hours later Defense Department and military officials confirmed his identity.

Penguin announced on Wednesday that a former Navy SEAL had written a narrative account of the May 2011 raid that killed bin Laden, and that it would be released Sept. 11.

The book, “No Easy Day,” is written under the pseudonym Mark Owen, and the author describes being present at Bin Laden’s death. He did not use his real name for safety reasons, the publisher said, adding that he would appear in disguise with his voice altered during television appearances to promote the book. Penguin said Thursday it had no plans now to change that set-up but would review it in the coming days.

The account promises to be one of the fall’s biggest titles; on Thursday it shot up to No. 4 on Amazon’s bestseller list. Penguin said it was increasing the print run on the book from 300,000 to 400,000.

Christine Ball, a spokeswoman for Dutton, the imprint of Penguin that plans to publish the book on Sept. 11, said in a statement prompted by the Fox News report:

Mark Owen, like every SEAL he has served with, has put his life on the line time and again for his country for more than a decade. Sharing the true story of his personal experience in “No Easy Day” is a courageous act in the face of obvious risks to his personal security. That personal security is the sole reason the book is being published under a pseudonym. We respectfully request that all news organizations and all Americans consider these facts when deciding whether to pursue or publicize his real identity.

Crackhead Marion Barry: 'I am a jobs czar'

August 23, 2012 3:47 pm
Liz Farmer, Examiner Staff Writer

Ward 8 Councilman Marion Barry (Examiner file photo)

Washington Examiner Local: DC - D.C. Councilman Marion Barry proclaimed himself a "jobs czar" in a statement he issued Thursday announcing a local hiring commitment he'd received from a major contractor on the city's St. Elizabeths redevelopment project.

"I am a jobs czar," said Barry, who represents Ward 8 where the project is located. "Jobs and career development have been a top priority for me over the years, as well as ensuring opportunities for minority-owned businesses. I don't just talk about the lack of jobs, I specialize in presenting results."

Barry announced he'd received a commitment from Parkinson-Grunley on its joint-venture contract with the District to make D.C. residents at least 60 percent of its workforce for its $4.5 million project stabilizing four buildings on the St. Elizabeth's East Campus. Barry had placed a hold on the council's approval of the contract, saying earlier this month that he wanted a jobs commitment from Parkinson-Grunley before the council took any action. The hold was met with ire and frustration by Mayor Vincent Gray, who wrote a letter to Barry telling him his actions undermined their mutual goals and would have "negative implications."

In his statement Thursday, Barry -- who also referred to himself by his popular nickname "Mayor-for-Life" -- defended his methods.

"It's my priority to get District residents working, as well as giving opportunities to Black and Hispanic-owned businesses," he said. "This should be the top priority for the Mayor and the administration as well. This method has proven successful, and I will continue to use this method as often as necessary to get District residents employed in careers with upward mobility."

A spokesman for Gray said the mayor was pleased Barry has lifted the hold but remained troubled by his "counter productive" tactic.

"Contrary to his assertions, no terms of the contract have changed," spokesman Pedro Ribiero said. "In the end, and with his hold set to expire on Monday anyway, all the Council member's action did was needlessly delay a project critical to catalyzing economic development and creating jobs in Ward 8."

Apparent Beef Between Food Cart Vendors Leads To Wild Shootout Near Yankee Stadium

Witness: Argument Over A Spot Results In Bullets Flying, 2 Wounded, 1 Arrested

August 23, 2012 11:58 PM
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) – Diners in a Bronx community ran for cover as shots rang out Thursday afternoon.

A bloodied shirt, deserted stands, and plenty of police were part of the aftermath of a broad daylight double shooting involving an ordained minister just blocks from Yankee Stadium.

The incident happened in the shadows of the ballpark on East 161st Street and Gerard Avenue, near the Crown Diner, around 1:30 p.m.

Witnesses said a man dressed in a suit and straw hat, later identified by police as Horace Coleman, shot two victims before dropping his gun and putting his hands up. He was then quickly arrested by court officers in the area who were on their lunch break, CBS 2′s Sean Hennessey reported.

Witnesses said the shooting occurred following a dispute between food cart vendors who were arguing over a spot. Investigators said the alleged shooter owns a water stand in the concourse area.

Patricia Perez and Anne Davis said they were inside the diner scared out of their minds.

“Everyone was having lunch and all of a sudden we heard like four pops — pop pop pop — and everyone started running,” Perez said.

“When I heard the pop, I hit for the bathroom. I was running for cover,” Davis added.

The shooting took place right outside the diner door, police said.

“He turned around and shot the man in the newsstand, then he turned around and shot down the block, a couple of bullets. I don’t know whether he hit somebody. They say he hit another person. Then he turned back, leaned over the man in the newsstand, and shot him again,” witness Debbie Haughton said.

“I could see the guy, I heard the shot. I looked over there — point-blank he was shooting this guy at least four times,” one street merchant told 1010 WINS’ Al Jones.

Alleged Bronx shooter surrenders (credit: surveillance video via CBS 2)

As the bullets flew, so did the diner’s customers, some fleeing to the back, others to the window to see outside.

“I saw the shooter running up the block with a gun in his hand,” witness Peter Katsihtis said.

Katsihtis said one of his customers, a man in an orange shirt, had just left his diner after a meal when he became a victim.

“He was telling me ‘Help me! Help me! I can’t breathe!’ and I noticed he was shot, a lot of blood on his body,” he said.

Police told 1010 WINS’ Jones a 41-year-old man was shot multiple times and is in critical condition, while a 60-year-old was shot in the torso. The shooting victims were transported to Lincoln Hospital.

One of the victims reportedly underwent surgery.

On Thursday night, Coleman’s family visited the precinct where he was being held and said the ordained minister had to have been pushed to the edge to ever use a weapon.

“He doesn’t curse. He doesn’t fight. He doesn’t to get in confrontations,” said Mickey Bentson, the suspect’s cousin. “It had to be him protecting himself in order to get out of that situation.”

Elisabeth Murdoch's attacks brother for not sharing her socialistic views

Elisabeth Murdoch (L) talks to her brother James Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive of News Corp, Europe and Asia, at Cheltenham Festival horse racing meet in Gloucestershire, western England March 18, 2010. Credit: Reuters/ Eddie Keogh

By Paul Sandle

EDINBURGH Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:39pm EDT

(Reuters) - Elisabeth Murdoch urged the media industry on Thursday to embrace morality and reject her brother James's mantra of profit at all costs, in a speech seen as an attempt to distance herself from the scandal that has tarnished the family name.

Addressing television executives, she said profit without purpose was a recipe for disaster and the phone hacking scandal at the News of the World tabloid - which has badly hurt her father Rupert Murdoch's News Corp empire - showed the need for a rigorous set of values.

The comments from a woman who has powerful friends in the British establishment and the support of her PR husband Matthew Freud, are likely to be examined for whether she could one day run News Corp instead of her brothers whose chances have faded.

"News (Corp) is a company that is currently asking itself some very significant and difficult questions about how some behaviors fell so far short of its values," she said in the annual television industry MacTaggart lecture.

"Personally I believe one of the biggest lessons of the past year has been the need for any organization to discuss, affirm and institutionalize a rigorous set of values based on an explicit statement of purpose," she said in remarks which drew applause.

Elisabeth Murdoch - a successful television producer who was overlooked for senior jobs at News Corp that went first to her brother Lachlan and then James - said a lack of morality could become a dangerous own goal for capitalism.

Rupert Murdoch last year closed the News of the World, which was owned by a News Corp unit, amid public anger that its journalists had hacked into the voicemails of people from celebrities to victims of crime. A number of former executives have appeared in court over the case and the government set up a judicial inquiry into press standards.

"There's only one way to look at this," Murdoch biographer Michael Wolff told Reuters. "This is part of a strategic repositioning of Liz Murdoch within the media world, with the business world and within the family."

The often humorous lecture delivered at the annual Edinburgh Television Festival came three years after James Murdoch used the same platform to confront a largely hostile audience with his vision for the industry.

Elisabeth, 44, and 39-year-old James had been very close, according to sources close to the family, but their relationship became strained by the hacking affair.

"Writing a MacTaggart (lecture) has been quite a welcome distraction from some of the other nightmares much closer to home. Yes, you have met some of my family before," she said to laughter, in a rare speech for the founder of the successful television production company Shine.

Stewart Purvis, the former head of broadcast news provider ITN, said on Twitter that the speech should be called "Why I am not my father or my brother".

Her highly personal speech appeared designed to win over any doubters, with references to childhood conversations at the breakfast table with dad to her continuing affection for the much-loved British playwright Alan Bennett.

She even lavished praise on the state-owned BBC, previously the butt of jokes by her brother but which also regularly airs programs made by her Shine company.

RECIPE FOR DISASTER

Referring to her younger brother James's 2009 speech, Elisabeth said his assertion that the only reliable, durable and perpetual guarantor of media independence was profit had fallen short of the mark.

"The reason his statement sat so uncomfortably is that profit without purpose is a recipe for disaster," she said.

"Profit must be our servant, not our master," she added. "It's increasingly apparent that the absence of purpose - or of a moral language — within government, media or business, could become one of the most dangerous own goals for capitalism and for freedom."

British tabloids have been accused of producing ever-more salacious stories before the scandal broke in an effort to maintain circulation. Rupert Murdoch admitted that the scandal had left a serious blot on his reputation.

The sharp change in tone, with its emphasis on personal responsibility, underlined how much had changed since James Murdoch used his own MacTaggart lecture to accuse the BBC of having "chilling" ambitions.

That speech, delivered in his role as chairman of the pay-TV group BSkyB and head of News Corp in Europe and Asia, consolidated James's position as heir apparent to his father's role. It also echoed Rupert Murdoch's own 1989 speech that broadcasting was a business that needed competition.

Since then, both men have been chastened by the fallout of the phone hacking affair.

At the height of the scandal News Corp had to halt a $12 billion bid to buy the rest of BSkyB it did not already own, angering investors and sowing doubts as to whether James had what it took to run the $55 billion empire.

News Corp announced in June that it was splitting off its newspaper business.

While brother Lachlan was often pictured with the family last year, Elisabeth stayed in the background. Lachlan stood down from his role as News Corp deputy chief operating officer in 2005 after clashing with senior executives.

Now James Murdoch's fall from grace has turned the spotlight onto Elisabeth in the long-running debate over who will one day replace their 81-year-old father at the head of the company.

"I think she was trying to put her mark on where she had come from and where she fits in," Enders analyst Toby Syfret told Reuters after emerging from the speech. "She made it clear where she didn't agree with James, and she made clear the things about her father that she admired.

"From a political level it was quite interesting."

Stressing her links to her father and the vision he espoused when he built his company over 60 years ago, she spoke in glowing terms of his 1989 speech.

"A quarter of a century later, I am still wholly inspired by those words and they are still deeply relevant today," she said. "I understood that we were in pursuit of a greater good - a belief in better."

(Writing by Kate Holton; editing by David Stamp)

NH Sheriff Candidate Vows Deadly Force To Stop Abortions

SZABO FOR PRESIDENT!

August 22, 2012 6:32 PM
Lauren Leamanczyk



MANCHESTER, NH (CBS) – A man running for sheriff in New Hampshire says if he is elected, he will arrest anyone involved in an abortion in his county.

UPDATE 8-23: Sadly, Sheriff Candidate Apologizes

Frank Szabo set off a firestorm with the comments. People on all sides of the political spectrum have condemned the statements, but Szabo stands by them. He says it’s the sheriff’s job to protect every citizen – even the unborn.

Szabo is running as a Republican for Hillsborough County Sheriff. But he injected a new issue in the debate when he sent out a press release saying he would arrest anyone performing an abortion.

He took it a step further when asked how far he’d go to stop one.

“Deadly force is the last thing law enforcement should be using, if a citizen’s life is in danger they should be protected,” says Szabo. “If there is no other choice, that’s what’s needed to protect the citizen.”

Republicans called Szabo’s statement, “Irresponsible, outrageous, and inappropriate.”

Democrats said, “Every Republican officeholder and candidate in New Hampshire must condemn and reject this man and his beliefs.”

His opponent, current Hillsborough County Sheriff James Hardy says Szbao’s statement could incite violence.

“My opponent wants to substitute his opinions for enforcing the law,” says Sheriff Hardy.

And voters in downtown Manchester seemed surprised abortion was even an issue the sheriff’s race.

“I’m not sure how he feels he can get away with that,” said one woman.

“I think people have strong opinions and it would influence how they vote,” said another woman.

Szabo isn’t backing down.

He says, “Why is there a difference between someone who is 20 years old and their life is in danger and someone who is nine months in utero.”

Szabo will face off against the current sheriff in the Republican primary next month.

NBC plans one-hour special on Romney's Mormon religion while completely ignoring Black Liberation Theology, the religion of Obama. Meanwhile ABC coincidently does segment on Mormons

Link #1: NBC gets no Romney campaign help on Mormon special

Link #2: ABC "World News" Does Four Minute Segment On Mormon Church

Good to see how "fair and balanced" the mainstream media can be, isn't it?

Va. judge orders release of detained veteran

LARRY O'DELL, Associated Press
Updated 3:09 p.m., Thursday, August 23, 2012

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A judge on Thursday ordered the release of a former Marine who was detained for psychiatric evaluation after posting strident anti-government messages on Facebook.

Prince George County Circuit Judge W. Allan Sharrett said at the end of a one-hour hearing that the involuntary commitment order issued by a magistrate against Brandon J. Raub was invalid because it contained no allegation or basis to hold him, according to the head of a civil liberties organization that represented the 26-year-old veteran.

"This is a great victory," Rutherford Institute executive director John Whitehead said. "He's a good human being. He just got caught in some weird bureaucratic meanderings and the judge recognized that there's really no true facts to hold this man in a psychiatric ward."

Raub was released from the Salem Veterans Affairs Medical Center late Thursday and was on his way back to his home in the Richmond area, a Rutherford Institute spokeswoman said. Both Raub and his mother, Cathleen Thomas, were unavailable for comment.

Raub, who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, was taken into custody Aug. 16 after being questioned by Chesterfield County police and federal agents about his Facebook posts. The FBI said the interview was prompted by complaints from people who read his ominous posts, including some that spoke of a pending revolution. One said "a day of reckoning" was coming, and another said: "Sharpen my axe; I'm here to sever heads."

Onlookers shot a video of Raub being led away from his home in handcuffs and posted it on You Tube, fueling a groundswell of support for the veteran and criticism that the government was trampling on his free-speech rights. The Charlottesville-based Rutherford Institute came to his defense, characterizing the government's actions as those of a police state. Raub was not charged with a crime.

"Brandon Raub was arrested with no warning, targeted for doing nothing more than speaking out against the government, detained against his will, and isolated from his family, friends and attorneys," Whitehead said. "These are the kinds of things that take place in totalitarian societies. Today, at least, Judge Allan Sharrett proved that justice can still prevail in America."

He called Raub's release a victory for the First Amendment.

"People a have right to go on Facebook or the Internet (and) say things that people might not agree with, "Whitehead said. "But that doesn't mean they're crazy or should be incarcerated for it."

Raub initially was taken the John Randolph Medical Center in Hopewell, where he was held over the weekend for a preliminary evaluation. After a hearing Monday, another judge ordered Raub detained for an additional month and transferred him to the Salem VA hospital.

Thursday's hearing was expected to be limited to Raub's objection to the transfer, so Whitehead said Sharrett's decision came as a surprise.

"The petition is so devoid of any factual allegations that it could not be reasonably expected to give rise to a case or controversy," the order says.

Associated Press Writer Michael Felberbaum contributed to this report.

Now, Lawmaker Questioning Fast & Furious Perjurer Eric Holder on Abusing FBI Travel Privileges

By Susan Crabtree
August 23, 2012, 01:38PM

Disgraced United States Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.

(The Washington Times) - Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican and the ranking GOP member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, wants answers about whether Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and other senior Justice Department officials misused FBI aircraft, hindering the agency's investigations and ignoring a White House order to cut travel costs.

Like a few senior administration officials with high-profile roles, Mr. Holder is required for security reasons to use government aircraft when he travels. But Mr. Grassley said he has received complaints that Mr. Holder has abused the privilege, using FBI plans for travel when aircraft were needed for FBI missions, and, in at least one instance, reserving an FBI plane and leaving it idling on the tarmac when he upgraded to a larger aircraft without telling the agency.

According to Mr. Grassley's account of the allegations, the travel by Mr. Holder and other senior department officials is so frequent that the FBI is considering leasing a private plane to conduct FBI investigative work.

Mr. Grassley; Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas Republican; Rep. Lamar Smith, Texas Republican and House Judiciary Committee chairman; and Rep. Frank R. Wolf, Virginia Republican, on Thursday wrote a letter to FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III asking for specific information about the use of the agency's aircraft by Mr. Holder and other administration officials.

"We are aware that the attorney general is required to travel by government aircraft for security purposes," they wrote. "We believe it is important to determine whether use of the FBI's aircraft by the attorney general and other senior Department of Justice officials adheres to relevant statutes and policies, is cost-effective, and does not hinder the operational readiness of the FBI."

Last year, The Washington Times reported that Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta was commuting home each weekend to Monterey, Calif., on a military jet and reimbursing the government for a fraction of the cost — an arrangement that came under scrutiny during Washington's tough budget times. Mr. Panetta has since apologized for the practice and said he will think about alternatives to the high-priced commute.

In their letter, Mr. Grassley and other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee became concerned about the allegations of Mr. Holder's use of the FBI's jet after reading about the $870,000 price tag for Mr. Panetta's personal travel.

During a Judiciary Committee hearing in May, Mr. Grassley asked Mr. Mueller about Mr. Holder's travel on FBI aircraft. At the time, Mr. Mueller said any "travel of the principals is secondary to use of the plane for the investigative work of the FBI" and Mr. Holder understands this priority. Mr. Mueller postponed responses to specific questions about the extent of Mr. Holder's travel to a later date.

In 2008, then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey, a Bush appointee's, use of government jets for personal travel came under scrutiny. McClatchy reported that Mr. Mukasey took so many trips to his home in New York on FAA, FBI or Drug Enforcement Administration planes that he was outside Washington a third of the time during a five-month period, and traveled to New York 45 times in an 11-month period.

Justice Department officials at the time defended Mr. Mukasey's personal travel, arguing that he had no choice but to fly on a government plane to see his family because of security reasons.

Mr. Holder's and Mr. Panetta's travel situations are drawing more scrutiny, particularly after President Obama issued marching orders late last year for all Cabinet agencies to cut back on everything, including cellphone use and official gifts such as mugs. He singled out travel as an area ripe for savings.

In May, after fallout over a lavish General Services Administration conference cost top officials at the agency their jobs, the Office of Management and Budget ordered agencies to cut travel costs by 30 percent, but agencies can get exemptions if certain types of travel are related to national security.

Immigration agents file suit against Napolitano over 'amnesty' program

By Shannon Bream
Published August 23, 2012

Aug. 6, 2012: Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano talks with a video crew for a TV show in Hangar One at Air Station Kodiak, Alaska. (AP)

FoxNews.com - Ten federal immigration agents have filed suit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano claiming recent directives are forcing them to break the law and ignore their duties when it comes to deporting illegal immigrants.

The suit was filed Thursday in Texas federal court by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. It challenges recent directives allowing some illegal immigrants -- particularly non-felons and those who came to the U.S. as children -- to stay and, in some cases, get work permits.

The suit, obtained by Fox News, says the agents are being forced to "violate federal law." It says the new directive "unconstitutionally usurps and encroaches upon the legislative powers of Congress." ICE Director John Morton is also named as a defendant.

Kris Kobach, lead attorney on the case, equated the move to give thousands of illegal immigrants a reprieve to the failed Fast and Furious gun-walking operation.

"In both instances, the Obama administration ordered federal law enforcement agents to break the law, to ignore the laws that they're supposed to enforce, and, in the case of the ICE agents, to actually break federal laws that say you're supposed to deport certain people," he said. "And in each case, the Obama administration seems to be doing so for political reasons."

Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state, is also an adviser to Mitt Romney and a co-author of the Arizona illegal immigration law.

DHS spokesman Matt Chandler, reacting to the suit, stressed that the current policy allows the department to focus on serious offenders -- he said ICE removed a record 216,000 criminal aliens in fiscal 2011.

"DHS uses prosecutorial discretion to assist in focusing vigorously on the removal of individuals who are convicted criminals, repeat immigration law violators, and recent border crossers," he said. "This policy is a temporary measure; Congress must still act to provide a permanent solution to fix the broken immigration system."

Napolitano defended the new rules during testimony last month before the House Judiciary Committee.

"These policies promote the efficient use of our resources ensuring that we do not divert them away from the removal of convicted criminals by pursuing the removal of young people who came to this country as children and who have called no other country home," she said.

The Supreme Court has recognized the ability of the federal government to use what's known as "prosecutorial discretion" in the enforcement of immigration law. In the recent case over the Arizona immigration law, the court defended the government's ability to make "some discretionary decisions."

In the suit, the agents are asking a federal judge to block the directives in question, saying they amount to an end-run around Congress and violate the separation of powers between the Legislative and Executive branches.

Republican lawmakers released a flurry of statements Thursday backing up the suit and challenging the administration policy.

"The Obama administration's amnesty program not only rewards lawbreakers, it also forces ICE agents to violate federal law. ICE agents should enforce our immigration laws and apprehend illegal immigrants. But the Obama administration makes it impossible for ICE agents to do their jobs," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said in a statement.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., has also raised concern about the possibility of ICE agents being compelled to release illegal immigrants with misdemeanor records.

"It is a sad day when our nation's law enforcement officers are left with no recourse but to file suit against the administration and its political appointees," he said in a statement.

As Usual, Left Labels Truth and Freedom of Speech as Controversial

Billboard Controversy Comes To North Texas

August 20, 2012 10:59 PM
Reporting Jason Allen



GAINESVILLE (CBSDFW.COM) - A billboard that sparked a protest in Indiana because of its reference to the Navy Seals, and removing the President from office, has appeared along I-35 in North Texas.

The ad in Gainesville depicts two men in camouflage holding weapons. The text next to the picture, in a military style font, says “The Seals removed one threat to America,” a reference to the killing of Osama bin Laden. It continues, “Remove the other in November.”

The bottom of the sign says it’s a political ad, paid for by TJ Schad, and has a Gainesville address.

At his home Monday, Tom Schad said he’s not acting for any political party, committee or candidate. He simply saw a similar picture in an email, with an accompanying note that said it should be on every billboard across the country.

“It just started out as something fun to do,” he said. “Let’s see if I could do it. I didn’t have a clue how to do it.”

Schad said he knew the owner of TerryCo., the company who leased him the billboard space through the November election. He had an artist at an advertising agency design the ad and it was up within a week.

“I think we were just trying to make a statement,” he said. “We felt we needed to change direction in the country, and that’s what we did.”

A similar ad in Elkhart, Indiana prompted a small protest last week. The ad specifically referenced voters removing the president.

Some demonstrators said though that comparing military action to take out a terrorist, with removing a president from office, was too far. Schad said he didn’t see how people could take the ad that way.

“Other than the fact it’s got some seals in there with a gun,” he said. “But I think it’s pretty obvious what they did and what the statement is.”

TerryCo said it only received a few curious phone calls about the board, and Schad said he hasn’t received a single complaint.

Rather people keep forwarding him a picture that he took of the board, that has made its way onto internet blogs. The retired Air Force mechanic said his only previous entry into the political world was a spot on the town airport and appraisal boards. He said he wasn’t looking for publicity, but realized over the last couple weeks he was starting to get it.

“If you’re going to I guess you may as well jump in with both feet,” he said.

Modern Day Slavery, A Consequence of Obamanomic Transparency

Obama's Budget to Add $4.4 Trillion to Debt in Next Four Years
On track to $20 trillion in debt in 2016.

1:41 PM, Aug 23, 2012
By DANIEL HALPER

(The Weekly Standard) By the end of this year, the federal debt is expected to be $16.2 trillion, which is $6.2 trillion more than when President Obama first came into office four years ago. Moreover, new analysis by the Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee finds that, over the next 4 years, if Barack Obama remains president and his budget is enacted, $4.4 trillion will be added to the federal debt.

Here's a chart illustrating the projected debt over the next four years:


As the chart notes, staying on the same path will mean that debt is expected to hit $17.5 trillion in 2013, $18.5 trillion in 2014, $19.4 trillion in 2015, and $20.3 trillion in 2016.

The last full year of Obama's presidency, if he is reelected, will be 2016.

"Federal debt will increase to $25.4 trillion by the end of 2022, an increase of $10.6 trillion (72 percent) under the president’s budget policies," the Senate Budget Committee notes.

It's been 1,212 since Senate Democrats brought a budget to the Senate floor.

Republicans Eye Return to Gold Standard

Published: Friday, 24 Aug 2012 | 6:39 AM ET
By: Robin Harding and Anna Fifield, Financial Times

CNBC - The gold standard has returned to mainstream U.S. politics for the first time in 30 years, with a “gold commission” set to become part of official Republican party policy.

Drafts of the party platform, which it will adopt at a convention in Tampa Bay, Florida, next week, call for an audit of Federal Reserve monetary policy and a commission to look at restoring the link between the dollar and gold.

The move shows how five years of easy monetary policy — and the efforts of congressman Ron Paul — have made the once-fringe idea of returning to gold-as-money a legitimate part of Republican debate.

Marsha Blackburn, a Republican congresswoman from Tennessee and co-chair of the platform committee, said the issues were not adopted merely to placate Paul and the delegates that he picked up during his campaign for the party’s nomination.

“These were adopted because they are things that Republicans agree on,” Blackburn told the Financial Times. “The House recently passed a bill on this, and this is something that we think needs to be done.”

The proposal is reminiscent of the Gold Commission created by former president Ronald Reagan in 1981, 10 years after Richard Nixon broke the link between gold and the dollar during the 1971 oil crisis. That commission ultimately supported the status quo.

“There is a growing recognition within the Republican party and in America more generally that we’re not going to be able to print our way to prosperity,” said Sean Fieler, chairman of the American Principles Project, a conservative group that has pushed for a return to the gold standard.

A commission would have no power except to make recommendations, but Fieler said it would provide a chance to educate politicians and the public about the merits of a return to gold. “We’re not going to go from a standing start to the gold standard,” he said.

The Republican platform in 1980 referred to “restoration of a dependable monetary standard," while the 1984 platform said that “the gold standard may be a useful mechanism”. More recent platforms did not mention it.

Any commission on a return to the gold standard would have to address a host of theoretical, empirical and practical issues.

Inflation has remained under control in recent years, despite claims that expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet would lead to runaway price rises, while gold has been highly volatile. The price of the metal is up by more than 500 per cent in dollar terms over the past decade.

A return to a fixed money supply would also remove the central bank’s ability to offset demand shocks by varying interest rates. That could mean a more volatile economy and higher average unemployment over time.

Copyright 2011 The Financial Times Limited

Why shouldn’t the government run the big industries?

Written on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
by Dennis Marcellino
Hat tip: PressPatrol.Com

(Patriot Update) Socialists and communists would say that ultimately government should run the big industries in a nation. And they say that’s because there wouldn’t be a greed or profit motive and it would be fair to all the people.

There are a few reasons why that’s a bad idea and the conclusions are wrong. And there are proofs that show how that line of thinking fails.

Reason #1: separation of church and state.

You might be thinking, this is a conservative website, and separation of church and state is a false notion anyway. But actually it’s a huge reason why this country was founded by European immigrants. But here’s an important thing to realize: it’s impossible to separate religion from government. Let me explain. Here is what the two basic tenets of religion are: (1) Define morals, and (2) Define existence. Therefore this country does now, and has always had, a dominant explanation of existence and a dominant philosophy of morality. And those two things create a framework from which laws and the social climate emanate. The current religion now is Secular Humanism, and its explanation of existence is evolution, and its philosophy of morality is political correctness. Therefore it can rightfully be defined as a religion. But declining social and economic statistics over the past several decades show that the increasing influence of this religion is based on policies that fail. And it can be proven (and has been in my books The Plague Of Liberalism and THE PROOF that God Exists and the Bible is True) that its morals and explanation of existence (as well as the “science” that is used to back them up) are not in harmony with nature and truth. And a lot of people are suffering as a result of the works of that religion. So if a government were to run the country, it would exclusively dominate with perhaps an inferior religion (as current and recent statistics show is the case now). Therefore there has to be freedom for other more effective philosophies and explanations to emerge. Unfortunately, inferior ones have currently come into dominance by devious means. And now good people are forced to live, marry and raise children in a culture that will tempt them with dysfunction and ultimately cause a lot of harm in their lives (not to mention the disgust and frustration they’ll experience watching it happen).

Reason #2: economics

I really just need to point to the failure of the economies in socialist and communist countries. A seeming exception, China, didn’t achieve success until it turned to capitalist ways. And still, there are large pockets of poverty in China. And under Obama, the economy of this country has greatly worsened, where it might take generations to climb out from under the debt he and the democrats have made (and will continue to make if re-elected).

Reason #3: no incentive

Perhaps the biggest reason why these countries go under economically is because there is no incentive to work hard. There is no reward for giving extra of your time and resources. And if you do work hard, the income just goes to the people who don’t work hard via government handouts. But it is interesting to note that it’s been recently reported that people get jobs in a very short amount of time after their 2 year run of unemployment checks runs out. But they had little incentive to do that as long as the government was supporting them. And another incentive to be giving – Christianity – has been impeded by the “no God” legal stance and moral climate of the mainstream institutions of this culture.

So the bottom line is: government control doesn’t work and is NOT fair to all … especially the innovators, the business growers (from whom the new jobs come), hard workers, and those holding to Biblical morality. Hopefully this country won’t go down further while the population comes around to figuring this out, as they are fooled and confused by short liberal phrases emotionally driven that tend to dominate the air time of the mainstream media. If left to dominate, more and more people will end up experiencing the pain and poverty that most people in socialist and communist countries have. And a recent statistic that says that 40 million people are “addicted.” That’s the result of the morals of the culture. So there already is a lot of suffering, mediocre lives and emotional pain happening due to the pressures and lack of understanding that comes with the politically correct morals of Secular Humanism (as opposed to love and deep fulfillment).

Also, from the conservative perspective, it would be helpful if catch phrases like “big government”, “smaller government”, “good morals” and “freedom” were explained (which I’ve done some of that here) instead of just stated. Without those specific explanations, I don’t think that a lot of people are understanding what they mean and why those concepts deserve their vote.

Byline:

Dennis Marcellino is the author of The Plague Of Liberalism (which can be seen at www.ThePlagueOfLiberalism.com) and THE Solutions (which can be seen at www.TheOptimumPoliticalSolutions.com). He is also available to speak: www.BiblicalValues.com, where you can also donate to his PAC: Americans for Biblical Values. He also is the author of the highly successful, inexpensive program that guarantees a permanent end to addiction at www.AddictionFreeForever.com.

On Education Swing In ‘Oiho,’ Obama Misspells Battleground State

DON'T BLAME TOTUS FOR THIS ONE!


Wednesday, August 22, 2012

(PatriotUpdate.Com) - President Obama needed a do-over to spell “Ohio” correctly on the campus of Ohio State University this week.

Although Obama and several students at a campaign stop Tuesday morning at Sloopy’s Diner on the campus of OSU tweeted out photos of the president correctly posing as the “I” in Ohio, another student supplied a photo of a spelling mishap to Mitt Romney’s campaign.

The photo, tweeted by Romney’s Ohio communications director, Christopher Maloney, shows Obama and three students all a little confused about how to spell the state’s name, with Obama holding his hands up in what seems to be an “H” and as the third letter.

“A word of advice to @BarackObama: It’s ‘O-H-I-O’ that has 18 electoral votes, not ‘O-I-H-O,’ ” Maloney tweeted.

Post Continues on thehill.com>>

Hat tip: PressPatrol.Com

Definition of child porn expanded to now include "simple nudity"?

Head Minn. St.-Mankato football coach arrested on child porn charges
Even if found innocent, life as Hoffner knows it, is over.

Published August 23, 2012

Aug. 22, 2012: This photo provided by the Blue Earth County Sheriff's Office shows Todd Hoffner, head football coach at Minnesota State, Mankato. (AP)

MANKATO, Minn. (AP) – The head football coach at Minnesota State, Mankato, was charged Wednesday with two counts related to child pornography after authorities said they found nude images of children on his cellphone.

Todd Hoffner, 46, of Eagle Lake, was charged with one count of using minors in a sexual performance or pornographic work, and one count of possessing child pornography. Both are felonies.

Police began investigating last week after a university official went to them with three videos of children that were said to be on Hoffner's work-issued cellphone, according to the complaint filed in the case.

The complaint said the children are Hoffner's.

Hoffner's attorney, Jim Fleming, said his client intends to fight the charges. At a bail hearing Wednesday, Fleming characterized the nature of the video as "private family moments." He added that the images contained nothing that was graphic, abusive or exploitive.

The complaint said Hoffner brought his university-issued cellphone to school officials earlier this month because it wasn't working. Hoffner was given a new one, and was told technicians would retrieve videos and pictures from his old phone for him.

A technician came across the videos while going through the data, and police were contacted.

Hoffner is on leave and a university investigation is pending. He posted bail and was released from custody Wednesday.

Hoffner is entering his fifth year as Minnesota State, Mankato's head football coach. He led the team to the playoffs in 2008 and 2009, and a share of the Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference title in 2011.

He has a 34-13 record at Minnesota State, Mankato, and was named NSIC coach of the year in 2009.

Dems rush to give illegal aliens licenses -- so they can vote

John Wildermuth
Updated 9:04 a.m., Thursday, August 23, 2012
Hat tip: MichaelSavage.Com


(San Francisco Chronicle) Democratic legislators are working with Gov. Jerry Brown and Department of Motor Vehicles officials to provide driver's licenses to hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants now eligible to work under President Obama's new "deferred action" policy.

"In the past, the argument against providing driver's licenses has been that it would be rewarding someone who has broken the law," said state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco. "But now we're talking about people who, by definition, have not broken any laws."

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, announced by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano in June, allows undocumented immigrants younger than 31 who were brought to this country illegally before they were 16 to apply for protection from deportation for a two-year renewable term. It applies to young people who are in school, completed school or served honorably in the armed forces and who do not have serious criminal records.

It's a much-watered-down version of the Dream Act for young immigrants, which Obama and his fellow Democrats have been unable to get through Congress.

But while the eligibility standards for the new program are clear, it is far less certain what the effects will be in California and the rest of the nation.

States set the rules

When it comes to driver's licenses, for example, each state sets its own eligibility rules, said Ann Morse of the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Governors in Texas, Arizona and Nebraska, for example, already have promised to block any efforts to provide driver's licenses or any other state services to young people under the deferred action program.

"The question is how the states want to treat this new class" of applicants, she said. "And one of the questions that's still unanswered is what documents the federal government will provide under the new program."

The document question is at the center of the California talks. Democrats who control the Legislature would like to see an administrative order that automatically grants the more than 400,000 immigrants eligible for deferment the right to a driver's license. DMV officials, however, argue that even with such an order, they might not be able to grant the licenses legally.

"It appears that young people who receive federal deferrals will be eligible for California driver's licenses, but it remains uncertain whether clarifying (state) legislation or regulations will be necessary," said Michael Marando, a spokesman for the DMV.

The reason goes back to California's long, contentious history of driver's licenses for undocumented workers.

It wasn't until 1993 that the state required proof that a person seeking a driver's license was a citizen or legal resident. Since then, efforts to lift that ban for undocumented workers have been vetoed four times, twice by Democratic Gov. Gray Davis and twice by Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The law now includes a long list of documents that can be used to prove legal residency to the DMV. But if the documents the federal government provides to the newly eligible immigrants aren't on that list, it may take a new bill to allow the licenses to be issued, Marando said.

Deadline approaching

If it takes a bill, it will have to be done in a hurry, because there's an Aug. 31 deadline for moving bills through the Legislature.

Negotiations are continuing, said Conrado Terrazas, an aide to Assemblyman Gil Cedillo, the Los Angeles Democrat who wrote the vetoed driver's license bills.

The fast-approaching deadline is the only real hurdle for a new bill. While Brown has told negotiators he won't support a bill that makes all undocumented immigrants eligible for driver's licenses, the governor reportedly would accept a more limited effort aimed only at those accepted for the deferred action program.

Because Democrats hold solid majorities in both the Assembly and the state Senate, finding the needed votes won't be a problem, said Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, D-San Francisco.

"It's ridiculous that you can buy a car and get insurance but not get a driver's license if you're undocumented," she said. "Most people depend on a car to go to work, take kids to school and do whatever else is needed in their daily lives."

GOP opposition likely

That's an argument unlikely to convince Republicans in the Legislature, who are expected to oppose any effort to allow the undocumented to receive licenses.

While something has to be done to help people who were brought to this country as children, that will take a federal plan that covers the entire country and takes place all at once, said Assemblyman Brian Jones of Santee (San Diego County), chairman of the Assembly Republican Caucus.

"Nibbling around the edges isn't going to fix this," he said. "This is part of a push in California to increase government handouts for people who came here illegally."

John Wildermuth is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer.

Court: Ex-NFL punter eligible for workers comp

By BRIAN WITTE, Associated Press
August 22, 2012

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Longtime-NFL punter Tom Tupa is eligible for workers compensation for a career-ending back injury he suffered while warming up for a preseason game in 2005 at FedEx Field while playing for the Washington Redskins, Maryland's highest court ruled on Wednesday. The court rejected the idea that football injuries should not be considered accidental because of the rough nature of the sport.

Tupa's injury happened "out of and in the course of (his) employment," the Maryland Court of Appeals said in its 16-page opinion.

"He was warming up for a game when he landed awkwardly and thereafter sought immediate medical treatment," Judge John Eldridge wrote in the opinion. "Ample evidence was presented to show that Tupa suffered a compensable accidental injury during the course of his employment."

The team and insurers argued that Tupa's injury was not an accidental personal injury within the meaning of Maryland's workers' compensation law.

The court rejected that argument.

"I don't think that clubs are now able to argue that, since football is a hazardous employment, players don't get workers' compensation benefits," said Benjamin Boscolo, Tupa's attorney.

The 46-year-old Tupa played 18 seasons in the NFL for seven teams from 1988 to 2005. He never played again after the injury, which happened in Landover, Md.

The team and insurers argued that the Maryland Workers' Compensation Commission did not have jurisdiction over Tupa's claim, because he was contractually bound to bring it in Virginia, where the Redskins are headquartered. The court, however, cited case law that found Maryland's workers' compensation law can apply to an employee's claim, despite language in a contract saying otherwise.

An NFL spokesman says the league hasn't seen the lawsuit and couldn't comment. A portion of the collective bargaining agreement does deal specifically with the filing of worker's compensation claims.

Tupa fell down after a punt during warm-ups and felt a sharp pain in his lower back at a pre-season game on Aug. 19, 2005. He described the pain as a "jarring" sensation, sought immediate medical attention and received medication, according to court documents.

Tupa filed for benefits because of his back injury in May 2006 with the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission, a claim he later withdrew.

He filed with the Maryland Workers' Compensation Commission in March 2007. The team and its insurer challenged Tupa's claim on the issues of jurisdiction, whether the injury was an accidental and whether his disability was related to the injury in August 2005.

In 2008, the Maryland Workers' Compensation Commission held a hearing on the contested claim, and it decided in March that year that it could exercise jurisdiction over Tupa's claim. Tupa was awarded temporary partial disability benefits and medical expenses. The team and its insurer then went to court and requested a trial by jury, which decided Tupa had sustained an accidental injury and that his disability was connected to the accidental on-field injury.

The jury's decision was appealed to the state's intermediate appellate court, which agreed with the commission and the jury's finding.

(Copyright 2012 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

FLASHBACK: Martial law by executive order

Jim Garrison
Posted: 03/21/2012 7:25 pm

(Huffington Post) President Obama's National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order of March 16 does to the country as a whole what the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act did to the Constitution in particular -- completely eviscerates any due process or judicial oversight for any action by the Government deemed in the interest of "national security." Like the NDAA, the new Executive Order puts the government completely above the law, which, in a democracy, is never supposed to happen. The United States is essentially now under martial law without the exigencies of a national emergency.

Even as the 2012 NDAA was rooted in the Patriot Act and the various executive orders and Congressional bills that ensued to broaden executive power in the "war on terror," so the new Executive Order is rooted in the Defense Production Act of 1950 which gave the Government powers to mobilize national resources in the event of national emergencies, except now virtually every aspect of American life falls under ultimate unchallengeable government control, to be exercised by the president and his secretaries at their discretion.

The 2012 NDAA deemed the United States a "battlefield," as Senator Lindsey Graham put it, and gave the president and his agents the right to seize and arrest any U.S. citizen, detain them indefinitely without charge or trial, and do so only on suspicion, without any judicial oversight or due process. The new Executive Order states that the president and his secretaries have the authority to commandeer all U.S. domestic resources, including food and water, as well as seize all energy and transportation infrastructure inside the borders of the United States. The Government can also forcibly draft U.S. citizens into the military and force U.S. citizens to fulfill "labor requirements" for the purposes of "national defense." There is not even any Congressional oversight allowed, only briefings.

In the NDAA, only the president had the authority to abrogate legitimate freedoms of U.S. citizens. What is extraordinary in the new Executive Order is that this supreme power is designated through the president to the secretaries that run the Government itself:

• The Secretary of Defense has power over all water resources;
• The Secretary of Commerce has power over all material services and facilities, including construction materials;
• The Secretary of Transportation has power over all forms of civilian transportation;
• The Secretary of Agriculture has power over food resources and facilities, livestock plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment;
• The Secretary of Health and Human Services has power over all health resources;
• The Secretary of Energy has power over all forms of energy.

The Executive Order even stipulates that in the event of conflict between the secretaries in using these powers, the president will determine the resolution through his national security team.

The 2012 NDAA gave the Government the right to abrogate any due process against a U.S. citizen. The new Executive Order gives the government, through the Secretary of Labor, the right to proactively mobilize U.S. citizens for "labor" as the government deems necessary and to coordinate with the Secretary of Defense to maintain data to coordinate the nation's work needs in relation to national defense.

What is extraordinary about the Executive Order is that, like the NDAA, this can all be done in peacetime without any national emergency to justify it. The language of the Order does not state that all these extraordinary measures will be done in the event of "national security" or a "national emergency." They can simply be done for "purposes of national defense," clearly a broader remit that allows the government to do what it wants, when it wants, how it wants, to whomever it wants, all without any judicial restraint or due process. As Orwell famously said in 1984, "War is peace. Peace is war." This is now the reality on the ground in America.

Finally, the 2012 NDAA was hurried through the House and Senate almost like a covert op with minimal public attention or debate. It was then signed by the president at 9:00 PM on New Year's Eve while virtually nobody was paying attention to much other than the approaching new year. This new Executive Order was written and signed in complete secret and then quietly released by the White House on its website without comment. All this was done under a president who studied constitutional law at Harvard.

It is hard to know what to say in the face of such egregious disregard for the integrity of what America has stood and fought for since its founding. It is hard in part because none of us thought such encroachments would ever happen here, certainly not under the watch of a "progressive" like Obama.

At one level, the prospect for war with Iran is probably an immediate justification. But the comprehensiveness of the Executive Order, like that of the 2012 NDAA, speaks to something much deeper, more sinister. I would suggest that this Order, like the NDAA, has been in the works for some time and is simply the next step in the logic of the "global war on terror." Our political elites have come to consider democracy an impediment to effective governance and they are slowly and painstakingly creating all the democratic legalities necessary to abridge our democratic rights with impunity, all to ensure our "security." Of such measures do republics fall and by such measures tyrants emerge.

The only thing that really remains is the occasion to test the new rules of the game. Perhaps that will be war with Iran, perhaps some contrived emergency, or perhaps, as long as the public and media remain asleep, no occasion will be necessary at all. It will just slowly happen of its own accord and we, like the frog in the pot of slowly boiling water, will just sit there and be consumed by our own turpitude.